One Penn Plaza, Suite 2430, New York, NY 10119
P: 212-382-1600
Get Directions ›

Press & News

In the News
Rapaport Law Firm has been featured in New York Magazine, National Law Journal,,, New York Law Journal, WABC News, New York Employee Advocate, NTV Russian Television, New York Daily News, Houston Chronicle, BNA Employment Discrimination Report and more.

Marc Rapaport has been selected to the 2017 New York Super Lawyers list

May 18, 2017

Marc Rapaport has been selected to the 2017 New York Super Lawyers list. Each year, no more than five percent of New York lawyers are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

Marc Rapaport has 24 years of experience in litigation, focusing on telecommunications law, New York overtime and wage law, and matrimonial matters.

Ex-superintendent sues embattled landlord Steve Croman over allegedly unpaid wages

October 7, 2016

Rapaport Law Firm's employment lawyers have led the battle to enforce the wage and overtime rights of New York City's building superintendents. Particularly in New York City's low income neighborhoods, powerful landlords exploit and abuse immigrant workers by requiring them to work 80-hour work weeks without compensation for overtime. Our recent federal wage lawsuit against NYC landlord Steven Croman was featured in The Real Deal.

Read The Full Article

New York Employment Lawyers Marc Rapaport and Christine Ortiz Support Proposed Changes to DOL Regulations

August 27, 2015

The employment lawyers at New York City's Rapaport Law Firm are working overtime to ensure that millions of works in the United States get compensated for their overtime. For far too long, employees have been given the short end of the stick. However, with proposed regulatory changes, relief is now in sight.

Read The Full Article

Appellate Division Upholds Summary Judgment for Divorce

Appellate Division Upholds Summary Judgment for Divorce

November 3, 2014

Last week, Rapaport Law Firm obtained the first Appellate Division, First Department decision recognizing that the only prerequisite for obtaining a judgment of divorce under D.R.L. §170(7) (irretrievable breakdown) is a statement by the plaintiff that the parties' marital relationship is irretrievably broken. The First Department upheld the decision by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Deborah A. Kaplan, in which Judge Kaplan dismissed the defendant-husband's attack against the parties' marital separation agreement. Judge Kaplan – and now the Appellate Division – held that disputes arising after the signing of a marital separation agreement do not hinder a trial court from issuing a divorce judgment. Read more about Rapaport Law Firm's ground-breaking victory at

Telecommuting: A Trend in Reverse? Marc Rapaport on The American Law Journal

Telecommuting: A Trend in Reverse? Marc Rapaport on 'The American Law Journal'

More than 3 million people telecommute for their jobs. But some big corporations, such as Yahoo and Best Buy, are bucking the trend. Is telecommuting a trend in reverse? Or has the train already left the station? Attorney Marc Rapaport joins host Christopher Naughton to discuss the issue on The American Law Journal. Click here to watch the video.

Marc Rapaport's Article, "What To Do If You're The Victim Of Pregnancy Discrimination", Featured on

TheLaw.tvMarc Rapaport's article regarding federal and state laws that prohibit pregnancy discrimination in the workplace was recently featured on the legal news website, In his article, Marc discusses important steps that victims of pregnancy discrimination should take to protect their legal rights under federal and state anti-discrimination laws. Marc has effectively handled pregnancy discrimination cases for more than 23 years.

Read the full article: What To Do If You're The Victim Of Pregnancy Discrimination.

Rapaport Law Firm Summer Intern Wins Youth Leadership Award

May 8, 2013 — Last summer, Rapaport Law Firm initiated a student internship program to inculcate skills among young scholars. Our program has already yielded demonstrative results for its first participant, Thomas 0'Connor. This month, Mr. O'Connor was awarded the Putnam County Youth Leadership Award based on his experiences and contributions with our firm. In his acceptance speech, Mr. O'Connor recounted how he successfully rose to the challenge of navigating the New York court system.

United States v. Clemens

United States v. Clemens

Rapaport Law Firm Successfully
Defends Confidentiality of New York
Divorce Records in Clemens Perjury Trial

Attorneys at the Rapaport Law Firm mounted an aggressive and successful campaign to protect our client's matrimonial records from the tentacles of the Roger Clemens perjury trial. We obtained a Federal Court order upholding the confidentiality of marital proceedings under New York Law.

Related Articles

Marc Rapaport on ABC News regarding the Britney Spears Child Custody Case, July 18, 2008

ABC News

"The worst possible position a litigant in a child custody case can be in is when they can't control their behavior during the case itself. It's one thing to walk into court with a messy history [and] quite another when you can't get yourself under control during the proceedings," said family law attorney Marc Rapaport. "And that's how she dug such a deep hole for herself in this custody dispute. At the end of the day, K-Fed, even though he wasn't perfect either, was destined to get custody."

Marinaro v. Greenberg Traurig LLP

We represented Yasmin Marinaro with regard to her claims for discrimination and retaliatory discharge against the law firm of Greenberg Traurig LLP. Ms. Marinaro, who was an executive assistant with the firm, alleged that she was the victim of sexual harassment and retaliation. 

Related Articles:

When Twelve Weeks is Not Enough: FMLA, ADA and NYCHRL

by Marc A. Rapaport, Esq.
NELAMost plaintiffs' employment lawyers are all too familiar with the stinginess of the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), both in terms of the substantive protections that it offers, and the damages that it makes available. Like decaffeinated coffee or nonalcoholic beer, the FMLA can, at times, seem a bit too weak to get excited about. The unavailability of punitive or emotional distress damages under the FMLA is particularly frustrating, given the seemingly modest burdens that the law typically imposes on employers.

Read The Full Article

Ready to Punch a Time Clock

by Kristen French
Marc A Rapaport Quoted in article on "They changed [the Fair Labor Standards Act] in a way that was probably thought to be pro-employer," he says. "Sometimes the language in the law has unintended consequences. It's amazing how often this occurs," he says.

Read The Full Article 

Russian TV

Marc A. Rapaport on Russian television - NTV

View the Video 

Ask the Expert

Ask the Expert: Interview with Marc Rapaport

New York Magazine's ASK THE EXPERTS divorce column features Marc Rapaport

Giray v. Cruey, New York Law Journal

(published in the NY Law Journal on 1/13/2003)

Practice Area: Family
Outcome: Order directing cancellation of pre-application child support arrears.
Description: Despite New York's statutory prohibitions prohibiting courts from cancelling pre-application child support arrears, our client's arrears were vacated, in their entirety, based on the Court's determination that there were extreme and unique circumstances. This case is one of only two instances in which a New York court has cancelled pre-application arrears.
To view the entire decision, click here.

Mena v. Key Food
Mena v. Key Food Stores Cooperative Inc. et al.,

2003 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 231 and New York Law Journal; March 31, 2003

Key Food

In this widely-publicized discrimination suit, plaintiffs alleged that obscenities, foul language, racial slurs and epithets directed at women and African Americans were common parlance at the Key Food offices. Approximately one year before this law suit was instituted, our client, a Key Food employee, sought our advice regarding the legality of taping the defendants' harassing and inappropriate comments.

Subsequently, the explosive and obscene comments captured on the tape recordings were aired on New York's major television stations, and in print media. In an important decision, the New York State Supreme Court (Kings County) upheld both the taping and the publicity, and rejected the defendants' assertions that disciplinary rules were violated. 

Key Food Case Articles:

Viglianco v. Herbst, et al.

 (published in the New York Jury Verdict Reporter)

During the course of her employment with the defendants, Ms. Viglianco, an attorney, was subjected to repeated insults and slurs concerning her national heritage. In addition, during her pregnancy, Ms. Viglianco was harassed by her supervisor, warned that she was required to return to work immediately after giving birth, and was assaulted and terminated by her supervisor when she inquired about disability benefits.Our client was awarded monetary damages after a three-day trial. 

Peralta v. Chromium Plating

 (published in the New York Law Journal)

Ms. Peralta was granted summary judgment on a Title VII pregnancy discrimination claim. During the case, defendants admitted that they terminated Ms. Peralta from her employment solely because of her pregnancy.

Gibli v. Kadosh

Gibli v. Kadosh, 279 A.D.2d 235 (2000) (New York Law Journal; Class Action Reporter)

In this dental malpractice action, our client signed a release approximately one month after a surgical procedure that involved the extraction of a third molar. During that procedure, our client's lingual nerve was severed, causing permanent and irreparable parasthesia. The Appellate Division held that the validity of the release was for the jury to decide. After a five-day trial, our client received an unusually high verdict for a dental malpractice claim. 
In the News
Contact Information
One Penn Plaza
Suite 2430
New York, New York 10119
Phone: 212.382.1600
Facsimile: 212-382-0920